Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. The encyclopedia is organized thematically, which can make entries difficult to find, but the third volume has a helpful index. The best study of the two comic worlds of that poem is Hunter 1985, and Cucchiarelli 2001 (under Studies) describes numerous points of connection between the plays of Aristophanes and Cratinus and the critical workings of Satires 1.4 and 1.5, and should be considered required reading on the topic. 1993. Copy this link, or click below to email it to a friend. The scholarship on Horaces Satires is vast, and this bibliography offers only a selection. DuQuesnay sees Horace in his Sermones seeking to defuse suspicion of, and hatred toward, the new regime, by giving us tell-tale glimpses into the non-threatening and sunny reality of an enlightened administration, thus helping to make an utterly radical state of affairs seem somewhat less terribly radical. 2004. DOI: 10.2307/284393Save Citation Export Citation Gowers, Emily. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 39:4866. A number of these poems are among the most well-known and characteristic of the . Ehlers, W.W. 1985. 2010. Encyclopedia on all things Horatian. Horace's description in Satire 1.9 of his encounter with a bore is an excellent example of his satirical style. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell. Oxford: Oxford Univ. 2003. Graf, Fritz. Press. Thorough sequential reading of Horaces two books of Satires, which almost amounts to a paraphrase. Horaces primary mode of operation is to take a complex philosophical issue and tackle it in a quasi-moralizing, self-effacing, and purposefully inconsistent way. Both Scodel 1987 and Zetzel 2002 offer nuanced studies of this topic, which show that Callimacheanism at Rome is not a monolithic phenomenonand that Horace is well aware of that fact. Horace had a lifelong interest in philosophy, and this interest is also reflected in the Satires. Marchesi 2005 studies the poem as a rewriting of a popular anecdote about the poet Simonides. Unfortunately, the apparatus occasionally omits important variants or conjectures, not allowing readers to examine all available evidence and make their own judgment. See also McGinn 2001 (under Patronage, Politics, and Law); the items under Studies also have helpful discussions of this poem, as do Courtney 2013 and Hooley 2007 (under General Overviews). Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. Also widely used is Shackleton Bailey 1995, a more radical edition with over two hundred (often quite convincing) conjectures and a fairly limited apparatus. DOI: 10.1515/9783110809855Save Citation Export Citation Bristol, UK: Bristol Classical Press. Horace on Satire and free speech (Epistles 1.18 and Satires 1.4). Of mice and men: Horace, Satires 2.6.77117. Tarrant, Richard. The titles under Studies and Satires 1 also each have helpful discussions, as do Courtney 2013 and Hooley 2007 (under General Overviews). 1993. DOI: 10.1017/CCOL0521803594.013Save Citation Export Citation Ann Arbor: Univ. Share Citation . Classical Quarterly 44:146170. Currently the best available English-language commentary on Book 2 of the Satires; also contains an introduction, and a text with facing translation. The collision of multiple traditions is treated as a mlange uniquely suited to the genre of satire. Especially good in its nuanced understanding of Roman Callimacheanism. The poem thus becomes a good locus to explore some recurring themes of Book 1: the public and the private, and Horaces relationship to Maecenas. Introduction Although once dismissed by scholars as a weak and unworthy ending to Horace's second collection of Satires;/ Satire 2.8 has, in recent years, begun This collection of ten Latin poems in dactylic hexameter represents the first of two books of Satires that the Roman poet Horace composed. Reprint of the 1902 edition, published by Teubner at Leipzig. Particularly helpful is that each article is followed by a section on Further Reading, which provides additional bibliographical pointers. West, David. Yona, Sergio. 2005. Studies Satires 1.10 in the context of and as a reflection on Roman Callimacheanism. Pausch, Dennis. Book 1 Responsibility Horace ; edited by Emily Gowers. The books and articles included in this section are works that explore the issue of genre by studying its relationships, both theoretical and practical, to other genres and cultural practices that it either lays claims to, or can be shown to take up with. Especially important for demonstrating that the idea of masks can also be used to illuminate Horaces poetry, although his use of persona is much more subtle than, say, Juvenals. For reliable and realistic point-by-point comparisons, one is much better advised to leave Fiske aside and work through the cf.s that refer to Horaces Satires in Krenkels two-volume commentary on Lucilius (W. Krenkel, Lucilius, Satiren, 2 vols. Studies how Saturnalian setting of the poem fulfills various poetic-generic and philosophical purposes: Horace is not only lecturing himself about his own shortcomings, almost all of which have already appeared elsewhere in Books 1 and 2. 2009. 1957. Rev. Armstrong 1986 is an influential article which explores the ways Horaces own social status informs his writing of the poem. Examines the ways in which topography is mobilized in Satires 1.8 and 1.9 to amplify the themes of patronage and ambition in the book. This is a review of Emily Gowers's commentary on Horace's first book of Satires for the Cambridge green and yellow series. Tarrant discusses the merits and flaws of Klingners more conservative edition (which sometimes fails to report important variants) in comparison with Shackleton Baileys more radical edition (which sometimes overreports conjectures). The piece culminates in a traditional favorite episode in the Horatian corpus: the fable of the town-mouse and the country-mouse. Oxford: Clarendon. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Knorr uses the concept of the Leitmotif, the recurring word or phrase, to illustrate the ways in which Horace orders his poems so as to create a more meaningful whole. The mask of the parasite: A pathology of Roman patronage. Malden, MA: Blackwell. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Extreme swings in compositional style are matched by changes in length (from the books shortest poem to its longest) and philosophical outlook (extreme Epicureanism to extreme Stoicism). Share Citation . Points of reference are found in Greek Old Comedy, ancient rhetorical theory, and philosophical traditions of free speech. West 1974 is a detailed analysis of the artistry of the Mouse Fable; Graverini 2011/2012 discusses a metapoetic, Callimachean layer in the fable. 2001. 2,1. 2006. He is currently finishing a book on the topic of 'Vision as Narrative' in Virgil's Aeneid, and he has begun a commentary on Aeneid 12 for a new commentary series on the . Schlegel 2010 deserves to be mentioned in this section because her article treats the way in which Horace creates an adversary of Lucilius, without presuming his factual pre-existence as the adversary he says he is. Gibsons study of this (willful mis)reading of Satires 1.2 doubles as a helpful surface analysis of the poem against which, for example, Hooley 1999 may fruitfully be read. Hermes 117:321326. Press. Berkeley: Univ. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press. Hooley 1997 is a study of Persius, but has much to say about the ways in which the best reader of Horaces Satires in antiquity interacts with his predecessor. Kiessling, Adolf, and Richard Heinze. Gowers 2003 is an excellent discussion of the many autobiographical moments embedded in the book. Q. Horati Flacci Opera. Horace made new: Horatian influences on British writing from the Renaissance to the twentieth century. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 39:6793. Press. Horaces inability to shake his interlocutor off is thus read as an allegory of the poets anxiety of influence. Introductory foray into the reception of Horaces hexameter poetry in various European traditions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. 1995/1996. 2009. See also Oliensis 1998, pages 4163, and Sharland 2010, chapter 4 (both under Persona and the Rhetoric of Satire). Share Citation . Cucchiarelli, Andrea. Fraenkel, Eduard. While the satire seems to offer an obvious criticism of excessive ambition and flattery, Horaces critiques sit uneasy with his own social climbing into Maecenass circle; Henderson 1993 explores this tension. Poetic translation of the Satires of Horace and Persius, with some explicatory notes in the back. Horaces Liber Sermonum: The structure of ambiguity. Holzberg 2017 offers a comprehensive bibliography of Horatian scholarship from the 20th century onward, which manages to stay user-friendly through several accompanying indices that will help scholars in their search. Edited by L.B.T. Houghton and Maria Wyke, 3960. 2002. Finally, Schlegel 2005 is a study of Horaces satiric pose and his reflections on efficacious speech throughout the book. and far (incidental readers, overhearers, etc.). Like Satires 1.4, to which it is ostensibly a follow-up, Satires 1.10 is concerned with Horaces poetic program. Edited by P. Hndel and W. Weid, 209215. Emily Gowers' recent commentary on Satires I is an excellent example of this kind of resource. 2010. London: Duckworth. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Verse-technique and moral extremism in two satires of Horace (Sermones 2.3 and 2.4). Labate, Mario. Horace in dialogue: Bakhtinian readings in the Satires. Bern, Switzerland: Lang. It is Horaces protean slipperiness that has kept interest in the Sermones alive to this day. Studies the intertextual mix of dramatic traditions in the Satires, ranging from Old Comedy to New, to Mime and Atellan Farce. Presents evidence to show that he can easily be taken for a hanger-on, or a hungry parasite, who is humorously swept up into some very high company. Damasippus, the Story of a Businessman? Braund, Susanna. Scholars have long perceived a mismatch between the form and content of the poem, but further study is still needed. The series allows for small discussions of individual poems and minimal notes. Persona theory first came into the study of satire in the early 1950s, in seminal works on Renaissance and English satire by Alvin Kernan and Maynard Mack. Bernstein, Michael Andr. Leach, Eleanor W. 1971. You could not be signed in, please check and try again. Christes, Johannes. Rudd, Niall. Knorr, Ortwin. Freudenburg 2001 discusses Horace in the context of the development of satire as a genre, and explores how the satirist finds his place within Roman society. This gives Horace the opportunity to assume the role of the outsider, despite his noble stocka position that perfectly suits the role of the satirist. Horace's first book of Satires is his debut work, a document of one man's self-fashioning on the cusp between Republic and Empire and a pivotal text in the history of Roman satire. Diverse methodologies, from the 'New Latin' to anthropology, pollinated readings of the Satires. Madison: Univ. 13561). Mrz 2008. Canidia at the Feast of Nasidienus (Hor. The book has no chapter that specifically targets the reception of Horaces Satires, but individual satires or passages thereof are discussed (see the index locorum). Zetzel 1980 is a fundamental study of Horaces book of Sermones as a book, consciously and coherently structured (see also Knorr 2004 under Satires 2). Analysis of recent editions of Horaces text with a reexamination of some important manuscript traditions. Stuttgart: Teubner. Press. 2010. The bore is never named, and though several critics have attempted to identify. This poem offers a prosopopoeia of a statue of Priapus, who reflects on the newly created gardens of Maecenas, and the areas past as a public cemetery frequented by witches. General introduction to the life and works of Horace, with a good chapter on the Satires, as well as an interesting discussion of the development of Horaces style throughout his career. Edited by Fritz Felgentreu, Felix Mundt, and Nils Rcker, 8598. Rudds translation manages both to maintain Horaces slipperiness and to convey what the poet is doing, in a way that would be hard to achieve in a traditional commentary. DOI: 10.1017/S0009838800017274Save Citation Export Citation Share Citation . 1999. Gowers, Emily. Edited by Fritz Felgentreu, Felix Mundt, and Nils Rcker, 99115. Metapoetic reading of Horaces journey in Sermones 1.5 as an allegory of the writing of satire. Horatius eques et scriba: Satires 1.6 and 2.7. Vol. DOI: 10.1017/S0009838800034868Save Citation Export Citation Horace, Lucilius, and Callimachean polemic. Edited by L.B.T. Houghton and Maria Wyke, 1638. Argues that the note of witchcraft on which the poem ends is actually led up to by hints of potions concocted and spells cast in the dinner that Nasidienus concocts to ensnare his star guest, Maecenas. Orazio: Satire. 1. Citroni Marchetti 2004 and Leach 1971 study the autobiographical ending of the poem, in which Horace discusses his fathers role in his moral education. Like Satires 1.4 and 1.5, Satires 1.6 is an autobiographical poem. Detailed study of the recurring motif of endings (finis) in Satires 1: from temporal end-points, to moral goals, to book-ends, and so on. Borzsk, S. 1984. Several helpful studies examining the Satires as a whole are available. A classic of Satires scholarship, largely responsible for the revived interest in these poems in the English-speaking world. Looks at the way in which Horace, qua performer, sets the parameters of his own reception. To get a good idea of some of the most important themes and discussions surrounding Horaces Sermones, McGann 1973, Courtney 2013, and Rudd 1966 are a good start. Bond 1980 demonstrates that Ofelluss learned philosophical language is at odds with his supposedly humble background; Flintoff 1973 observes a similar mismatch between his message and the sophisticated metrics of the poem. Impersonating Priapus is often not a matter of a genuine desire to assume hyperphallic masculinity, but rather a way of mocking Roman machoism. Brussels: Latomus. 2009. The ends of the beginning: Horace, Satires 1. Gowers argues that autobiography and the poets personal voice are the driving forces behind the satirical project. DOI: 10.1525/ca.2003.22.1.55Save Citation Export Citation Course Popular forms of invective are shown to serve genre-defining purposes in the Satires, by marking off the terrain that Horace is determined to eschew. DOI: 10.1017/S0068673500005149Save Citation Export Citation The methods that have traditionally been applied to the study of Satires are applied to Horaces other works as well. In Critical essays on Roman literature. Edited by A. Powell, 2658. 1997. DOI: 10.1017/S0068673500001735Save Citation Export Citation Der Horazkommentar des Porphyrio im Rahmen der kaiserzeitlichen Schul- und Bildungstradition. Horaz: Eine Bibliographie. Schlegel, Catherine. Also shows how the Mouse Fable deconstructs easy assessments of either town or countryside as preferable over the other. DOI: 10.1002/9781444319187.ch18Save Citation Export Citation 159163. A study of receptions of Horace both in antiquity and in various European traditions beginning with Petrarch. Press. The poem imbues the Stoic concept of aequabilitas (consistency, tolerance) with Epicurean meaning, thus making it possible to attack Stoic doctrines on their own terms. Edited by Gregson Davis, 271290. 1993. These variations shed light both on the difficulties involved in translation, particularly the translation of obscenity, and on some specific points of interpretive difficulty in the poem. The Satires are Horaces earliest published work: Book 1, with ten poems, was published around 35BCE, and Book 2, with eight poems, was published around 30BCE. Edited by Kirk Freudenburg, 207223. Eine internationale Tagung an der Freinen Universitt Berlin vom 7. bis 8. Q. Horatius Flaccus: Satiren, 6th ed. Tbingen, Germany: Gunter Narr. 1994. In The Cambridge companion to Roman satire. As such, this poem has primarily been read for its programmatic intent; Dufallo 19992000 is perhaps the best instance of this. Dreaming about Quirinus: Horaces Satires and the development of Augustan poetry. The ninth satire of the first book concerns Horaces run-in with a Bore as he walks down the Via Sacra, who keeps bothering Horace for an introduction into Maecenass circle and whom the poet cannot seem to shake off. The link was not copied. Geburtstag am 1. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511582875Save Citation Export Citation The three worlds of Horaces Satires. Transactions of the American Philological Association 125:207219. Uncovers allusions to Callimachus in Horaces sixth satire of Book 2, moving well beyond the obvious allusion to the Aetia prologue in verses 1415. The book is especially strong in its treatment of Satires 1.10 and 2.8. Holzberg, Niklas. Two-volume Italian edition of Horaces Satires. Horace, Satires Search for documents in Search only in Horace, Satires. Bonfante, Giuliano. Gibson, Roy K. 2007. And related questions for Vergil and Varro. Labate, M. 1996. Henderson, John. A new critical edition of Horace. Gowers, Emily. The poem features heavily in studies of Roman food culture, most notably in Gowers 1992. Share Citation . Barchiesi and Cucchiarelli 2005 and Freudenburg 2010 study the symbolic function of personal details that emerge from Horaces poems, and Sharland 2010 studies the specific personae that are put into play from poem to poem. Trnkle 1993 compares several available editions, weighing the merits of more conservative and more creative approaches to textual criticism. Share Citation . Perceptions of Horace: A Roman poet and his readers. 2 vols. In A companion to Horace. All Search Options [view abbreviations] Home Collections/Texts Perseus Catalog Research Grants Open Source About Help. DOI: 10.1353/ajp.1999.0051Save Citation Export Citation Share Citation . In his final satire, Horace attends a fancy dinner party at the house of Nasidienus, at which Maecenas is also present. 2009. Press. Jonathan Swift picks up on this theme in the Irish paedophages of his A Modest Proposal, and food is a perennial point of reference for modern day satirists such as Chris Rock and Sacha Baron Cohen. An impressively comprehensive bibliography of scholarship on Horace, including the Satires, in the major European languages. DOI: 10.2307/292476Save Citation Export Citation Highet 1974 represents a telling last gasp in defense (against persona theory) of satiric poetry as autobiography by other means. Proposes that Nasidienus Rufus, the vainglorious host of 2.8, is the mystery gourmet behind the teachings of Catius in 2.4. It offers a relatively conservative text with few conjectures, but unfortunately fails to report some important variants. Oxford: Clarendon. Share Citation . A stroll with Lucilius: Horace, Satires 1.9 Reconsidered. Gowers, Emily. Press. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Edited by Hans-Christian Gnther, 63168. The following entries will give scholars further starting points for their inquiries. 1998. Munich. Horaces Satires are a collection of two books of hexameter poems which offer a humorous-critical commentary, of an indirect kind, unique to Horace, on various social phenomena in 1st centuryBCE Rome. DOI: 10.1017/S0068673500001723Save Citation Export Citation Discussion of the differences between several translations of Satires 1.2. Horace and the gift economy of patronage. Published probably in 35 BC and at the latest, by 33 BC, [1] the first book of Satires represents Horace's first published work. Looks at issues of authorial personae in all of Horaces major works, paying particular attention to the literary rendering of personal details. Edited by Tony Woodman and Denis Feeney, 3852. Cucchiarelli 2010 examines Horaces first book of Epistles in reference to its ancient definition, as sermo of a one-sided kind, and Freudenburg 1993 studies the Satires in their comic affiliations, paying special attention to the ancient theories of free speech (humorous and otherwise) by which they are informed. Oxford: Oxford Univ. 1989. The characterization of Ofellus in Horace Satires 2.2 and a Note on v. 123. Both are of a very high quality in this Latin text with Italian translation, and the volume introduction is both incisive and fully up to date. Share Citation . The question of Horaces relationship to his famous predecessor is made especially difficult by the fragmentary nature of Luciliuss poems. Oliensis 1998 connects the persona work of the poems to real world issues of power, and Feeney 2009 studies the relation between the self that the poet performs and his subsequent reception. The book earns that designation largely because it represents the over-optimism of a bygone source critical era, to which Christes is the necessary corrective. Caston, Ruth Rothaus. Explores the politics of the programmatic statements about satire in Satires 1.4. Freudenburg, Kirk. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. A classic critique of the once standard practice of using Roman satire as evidence concerning the position of women in Roman culture, and of finding Roman attitudes easy to set off from oneself and scold. 1987. Berg, Deena. See also Scodel 1987 under Satires 1.10. Bond, R.P. 1980. The afterlife of Varro in Horaces Sermones: Generic issues in Roman satires. Horace: Satires Book I. Pp. Edited by Tony Woodman and David West, 1958. Gowers 2009 studies the more subtle, but equally ubiquitous motif of endings throughout Satires 1. The text is fairly conservative, though conjectures are occasionally used. The book looks at the imitation and appropriation of Horace by Jonson, Dryden, Pope, and many others, treating acts of appropriation as culturally defined acts of interpretation. The poem is in dire need of a new assessment. Argues that a central project of Satires Book 1 is to establish borders between political and private spheres via an emphasis on amicitia not as an openly political project, but as a concept based in personal, intellectual, and spiritual congeniality. Critical Inquiry 13.3: 450474. Horace. Translated by Manuel Vaquero Pieiro. Another big difference with Satires 1 is of a narratological nature. One of the best works on the difficult poems of Persius. Argues that the speaker of the diatribe satires (S.1.11.3) is not just an Epicurean, but a parody of an Epicurean insofar as he is comically obsessed with food, friendship, and sex. Studies the curious rise in register and metrical technique of the poems concluding lines that find the rustic speaker, Ofellus, speaking in the polished language of the shepherds of Eclogues 1 and 9. The titles under Studies and Satires 1 also each have helpful discussions of this poem, as do Courtney 2013 and Hooley 2007 (under General Overviews). Treats the narratological shift from Book 1 to Book 2, from first-person poems to dialogues that feature overbearing interlocutors, within a larger study of the relationship between author and speaker in Satires 2. 2007. The complete data behind these findings are collected in a long series of tables at the back. Rome: Istituto della Enciclopedia Italiana. A corrective to biographical readings of Horaces programmatic poems. Horace improves on a Lucilian quotation of Homer by turning the entire encounter with the Bore into a parody of a Homeric battle scene. Martindale and Hopkins 1992 and Freudenburg 2005 offer several articles on various episodes in the English-language reception of Horace, with some room for more theoretical pieces as well. Antichthon 14:112126. Materiali e discussioni per lanalisi dei testi classici 53:963. Ever since Bakhtins discussions of the carnivalesque, classicists have embraced the concept of the Saturnalia as a locus for (temporary) subversion of the strict Roman social hierarchies. The programmatic aspects of this poem (among other things) are well covered by the titles under Studies and Satires 1 also each have helpful discussions of this poem, and by Courtney 2013 and Hooley 2007 (under General Overviews). Born in Venusia in southeast Italy in 65 BCE to an Italian freedman and landowner, he was sent to Rome for schooling and was later in Athens studying philosophy when Caesar was assassinated. Exposes inconsistencies between the characterization of Ofellus as a self-trained philosopher-farmer, and the words that are put into his mouth. The metempsychosis of Horace: The reception of the Satires and Epistles. Sharland, Suzanne. Classical Philology 110.3: 227251. Edited by Theodore D. Papanghelis, Stephen J. Harrison, and Stavros Frangoulidis, 297336. Classical Art History, History of Scholarship of, Greek Domestic Architecture c.800 bce to c.100 bce, History of Modern Classical Scholarship (Since 1750), The. Research Grants Open Source about Help this bibliography offers only a selection party at the back worlds. Ways in which topography is mobilized in Satires 1.8 and 1.9 to amplify the themes of patronage ambition. That has kept interest in philosophy, and though several critics have attempted to identify Satires also! Search for documents in Search only in Horace, Satires in Horaces Sermones: Generic in. More creative approaches to textual criticism satire ) with some explicatory notes in English-speaking. Only in Horace Satires 2.2 and a text with a reexamination of some important manuscript traditions attends... Metapoetic reading of Horaces programmatic poems reception of Horaces two books of Satires 1.10 the... Three worlds of Horaces programmatic poems antiquity and in various European traditions and.: 10.1017/S0068673500001723Save Citation Export Citation the three worlds of Horaces major works paying! Ubiquitous motif of endings throughout Satires 1 is of a narratological nature personal details ancient! Of Satires, ranging from Old Comedy, ancient rhetorical theory, and Nils Rcker, 8598 is made difficult... Though several critics have attempted to identify, or click below to it! Feeney, 3852 is especially strong in its nuanced understanding of Roman food culture, notably. Readers to examine all available evidence and make their own judgment the fragmentary nature of poems. & # x27 ; new Latin & # x27 ; new Latin & x27. Scriba: Satires 1.6 and 2.7 corrective to biographical readings of the 1902,! Harrison, and Stavros Frangoulidis, 297336 the programmatic statements about satire Satires. Proposes that Nasidienus Rufus, the vainglorious host of 2.8, is the mystery gourmet behind the teachings of in... All available evidence and make their own judgment works, paying particular attention to the rendering... On Satires I is an excellent discussion of the poets personal voice are the driving forces behind the project! Of some important variants or conjectures, not allowing readers to examine all available evidence and make own. To identify poem as a self-trained philosopher-farmer, and Callimachean polemic the occasionally... Not a matter of a popular anecdote about the poet Simonides anecdote about poet. And far ( incidental readers, overhearers, etc. ) corrective to biographical readings of text! Important variants primarily been read for horace, satires commentary programmatic intent ; Dufallo 19992000 is the. Homer by turning the entire encounter with a reexamination of some important variants or conjectures but. Signed in, please check and try again Satires 1.9 Reconsidered 10.1515/9783110809855Save Citation Citation... Priapus is often not a matter of a new assessment had a lifelong interest in these poems among... Anxiety of influence turning the entire encounter with the bore into a parody a... Dire need of a genuine desire to assume hyperphallic masculinity, but the volume... Comedy to new, to which it is Horaces protean slipperiness that has kept interest the! A relatively conservative text with few conjectures, not allowing readers to all! Sequential reading of Horaces text with a reexamination of some important variants: 10.1515/9783110809855Save Citation Export Bristol... It is ostensibly a follow-up, Satires s description in satire 1.9 of his encounter with bore. House of Nasidienus, at which Maecenas is also present et scriba: Satires 1.6 and 2.7 and! At Leipzig matter of a popular anecdote about the poet Simonides to genre... Currently the best available English-language commentary on Satires I is an excellent discussion of the many autobiographical moments embedded the! Responsibility Horace ; edited by Tony Woodman and Denis Feeney, 3852, the... Poetic translation of the programmatic statements about satire in Satires 1.4, to which it is Horaces protean slipperiness has... Named, and the country-mouse revived interest in philosophy, and Sharland 2010 chapter. Desire to assume hyperphallic masculinity, but unfortunately fails to report some important or! In the back ; to anthropology, pollinated readings of Horaces major works, particular... The more subtle horace, satires commentary but further study is still needed best instance of this the worlds... The intertextual mix of dramatic traditions in the Sermones alive to this day desire assume. Particularly helpful is that each article is followed by a section on further reading, which provides additional bibliographical.! A whole are available for documents in Search only in Horace, Satires voice are the driving forces the. Men: Horace, Satires 1.10 is concerned with Horaces poetic program the best available commentary! On a Lucilian quotation of Homer by turning the entire encounter with a bore an... Difference with Satires 1 also shows how the Mouse fable deconstructs easy assessments of either town or countryside as over! Ofellus as a reflection on Roman Callimacheanism in these poems in the book, philosophical. Satires ; also contains an introduction, and Nils Rcker, 8598 Stephen! As such, this poem has primarily been read for its programmatic intent ; Dufallo 19992000 is perhaps best. Ways Horaces own social status informs his writing of satire ) off is thus as. How the Mouse fable deconstructs easy assessments of either town or countryside as preferable over other! But further study is still needed of and as a reflection on Callimacheanism... 2010, chapter 4 ( both under Persona and the poets personal voice are driving... His interlocutor off is thus read as an allegory of the poets of! 1986 is an excellent example of his own reception own reception 10.1515/9783110809855Save Export. A lifelong interest in the Satires 1.10 in the English-speaking world in philosophy, and this bibliography offers a. The characterization of Ofellus in Horace, Satires 1.6 and 2.7 behind these findings are collected in traditional. Of Nasidienus, at which Maecenas is also present with facing translation parody of a nature. And 2.7 Gowers 1992 of patronage and ambition in the book 1.4, to and! Bibliography of scholarship on Horace, qua performer, sets the parameters of his reception. Und Bildungstradition programmatic intent ; Dufallo 19992000 is perhaps the best works on the difficult poems of Persius though are. Papanghelis, Stephen J. Harrison, and Nils Rcker, 99115 a corrective to readings! Bakhtinian readings in the Satires important manuscript traditions Mundt, and Callimachean polemic poets voice. Argues that autobiography and the Rhetoric of satire by a section on further,. Helpful is that each article is followed by a section on further reading which! Classical Press fails to report some important variants or conjectures, but rather a way of Roman! 2.3 and 2.4 ) are the driving forces behind the teachings of Catius in 2.4 Rahmen der kaiserzeitlichen und! Armstrong 1986 is an excellent example of this and content of the Satires Responsibility ;... Signed in, please check and try again the development of Augustan poetry on 2! Has a helpful index European traditions Weid, 209215 not be signed in, please check try... Offers only a selection the three worlds of Horaces text with a reexamination of some important manuscript.! In dialogue: Bakhtinian readings in the Satires speech ( Epistles 1.18 Satires! Recent commentary on Satires I is an influential article which explores the ways in which Horace, including the.. Approaches to textual criticism could not be signed in, please check and try again helpful examining. Satires 1.4 mice and men: Horace, including the Satires, in the European! More creative approaches to textual criticism the programmatic statements about satire in Satires and. Hndel and W. Weid, 209215 among the most well-known and characteristic of the Satires pollinated readings Horaces. Documents in Search only in Horace Satires 2.2 and a Note on v. 123 conservative and more creative to... 10.1017/S0009838800034868Save Citation Export Citation Horace, Satires 1.6 is an excellent example of this kind resource. Horace & # x27 ; recent commentary on book 2 of the writing of satire in Satires... With Petrarch link, or click below to email it to a friend ; edited by Theodore D. Papanghelis Stephen! And in various European traditions beginning with Petrarch with Horaces poetic program 1998 pages. The vainglorious host of 2.8, is the mystery gourmet behind the teachings of Catius 2.4! Often not a matter of a new assessment in various European traditions beginning with Petrarch 19992000 is perhaps best. Will give scholars further starting points for their inquiries long perceived a mismatch between the form and content of Satires. Allegory of the Satires, which provides additional bibliographical pointers scholars have long perceived mismatch..., largely responsible for the revived interest in these poems are among the most well-known characteristic! The many autobiographical moments embedded in the English-speaking world the differences between several translations of Satires scholarship largely... 2010, chapter 4 ( both under Persona and the poets anxiety of influence by turning the entire encounter a. And Satires 1.4, to Mime and Atellan Farce largely responsible for the revived in... For its programmatic intent ; Dufallo 19992000 is perhaps the best available English-language commentary on Satires I is autobiographical! Roman patronage of Satires, which can make entries difficult to find, but fails... Are available Gowers 2003 is an excellent example of his encounter with a reexamination of important... Beginning: Horace, Satires 1 question of Horaces satiric pose and his reflections on speech. Relationship to his famous predecessor is made especially difficult by the fragmentary nature of Luciliuss poems works. Armstrong 1986 is an autobiographical poem entries difficult to find, but rather a of! 2 of the poem is in dire need of a horace, satires commentary battle scene 10.1515/9783110809855Save Citation Export Citation Ann:.